Madar v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Svcs. — immigration — affirmance — Porter
The Third Circuit today rejected an immigrant’s argument that he was entitled to citizenship because his father had been a citizen and constructively satisfied the statutory requirements for retaining citizenship. The opinion assumed that the father retained his citizenship but held that any citizenship did not transfer to the son, joining other circuits in refusing to infer an equitable exception to the relevant statutory requirements.
The lucid opinion is the first precedential opinion authored by the Third Circuit’s newest judge, Judge David Porter.
Joining Porter were Greenaway and Shwartz. The case was decided without oral argument.