US v. Steiner — criminal sentencing — reversal — Fuentes
The Third Circuit today vacated a criminal sentence, ruling that the district court committed plain error when it sentenced the defendant as a career offender using a conviction under Pennsylvania’s burglary statute. That statute is not divisible and thus the sentencing court was obligated to apply the categorical approach instead of the modified categorical approach it used.
The posture of the case was interesting. The court had affirmed the defendant’s conviction in a 2016 published opinion that I discussed here. (I’m not rehashing the parts of today’s opinion that remained unchanged, though they are significant.) In his petition for certiorari, as the court explained maybe a wee bit defensively, the defendant raised his sentencing argument for the first time, and the Supreme Court vacated and remanded. On remand, the government confessed plain error, and the court agreed.
Also of note: the court recognized that the defendant likely had already served longer than he would be resentenced to and therefore ordered him released pending expedited resentencing.
Fuentes was joined by Jordan and Vanaskie. Arguing counsel remained Renee Pietropaolo for the defendant and Jane Dattilo for the government.